GLOBAL RESEARCH SYNDICATE
No Result
View All Result
  • Login
  • Latest News
  • Consumer Research
  • Survey Research
  • Marketing Research
  • Industry Research
  • Data Collection
  • More
    • Data Analysis
    • Market Insights
  • Latest News
  • Consumer Research
  • Survey Research
  • Marketing Research
  • Industry Research
  • Data Collection
  • More
    • Data Analysis
    • Market Insights
No Result
View All Result
globalresearchsyndicate
No Result
View All Result
Home Data Collection

A giant planet candidate transiting a white dwarf

globalresearchsyndicate by globalresearchsyndicate
September 16, 2020
in Data Collection
0
A giant planet candidate transiting a white dwarf
0
SHARES
19
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

  • 1.

    Akeson, R. L. et al. The NASA Exoplanet Archive: data and tools for exoplanet research. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacif. 125, 989–999 (2013).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 2.

    Villaver, E. & Livio, M. The orbital evolution of gas giant planets around giant stars. Astrophys. J. Lett. 705, 81–85 (2009).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 3.

    Luhman, K. L., Burgasser, A. J. & Bochanski, J. J. Discovery of a candidate for the coolest known brown dwarf. Astrophys. J. Lett. 730, 9 (2011).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 4.

    Marsh, T. R. et al. The planets around NN Serpentis: still there. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 437, 475–488 (2014).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 5.

    Jura, M. A tidally disrupted asteroid around the white dwarf G29–38. Astrophys. J. Lett. 584, 91–94 (2003).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 6.

    Kilic, M., von Hippel, T., Leggett, S. K. & Winget, D. E. Excess infrared radiation from the massive DAZ white dwarf GD 362: a debris disk? Astrophys. J. Lett. 632, 115–118 (2005).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 7.

    Becklin, E. E. et al. A dusty disk around GD 362, a white dwarf with a uniquely high photospheric metal abundance. Astrophys. J. Lett. 632, 119–122 (2005).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 8.

    Gänsicke, B. T., Marsh, T. R., Southworth, J. & Rebassa-Mansergas, A. A gaseous metal disk around a white dwarf. Science 314, 1908 (2006).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 9.

    Wilson, T. G., Farihi, J., Gänsicke, B. T. & Swan, A. The unbiased frequency of planetary signatures around single and binary white dwarfs using Spitzer and Hubble. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 487, 133–146 (2019).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 10.

    Vanderburg, A. et al. A disintegrating minor planet transiting a white dwarf. Nature 526, 546–549 (2015).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 11.

    Manser, C. J. et al. A planetesimal orbiting within the debris disc around a white dwarf star. Science 364, 66–69 (2019).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 12.

    Vanderbosch, Z. et al. A white dwarf with transiting circumstellar material far outside the Roche limit. Astrophys. J. 897, 171 (2020).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 13.

    Debes, J. H. & Sigurdsson, S. Are there unstable planetary systems around white dwarfs? Astrophys. J. 572, 556–565 (2002).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 14.

    Gänsicke, B. T. et al. Accretion of a giant planet onto a white dwarf star. Nature 576, 61–64 (2019).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 15.

    McCook, G. P. & Sion, E. M. A catalog of spectroscopically identified white dwarfs. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 121, 1–130 (1999).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 16.

    Nelson, L., Schwab, J., Ristic, M. & Rappaport, S. Minimum orbital period of precataclysmic variables. Astrophys. J. 866, 88 (2018).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 17.

    Marley, M., Saumon, D., Morley, C. & Fortney, J. Sonora 2018: Cloud-free, Solar Composition, Solar C/O Substellar Atmosphere Models and Spectra (2018); https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1309035

  • 18.

    Spiegel, D. S., Burrows, A. & Milsom, J. A. The deuterium-burning mass limit for brown dwarfs and giant planets. Astrophys. J. 727, 57 (2011).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 19.

    Casewell, S. L. et al. WD0837+185: the formation and evolution of an extreme mass-ratio white-dwarf–brown-dwarf binary in Praesepe. Astrophys. J. Lett. 759, 34 (2012).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 20.

    Littlefair, S. P. et al. The substellar companion in the eclipsing white dwarf binary SDSS J141126.20+200911.1. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 445, 2106–2115 (2014).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 21.

    Rappaport, S. et al. WD 1202-024: the shortest-period pre-cataclysmic variable. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 471, 948–961 (2017).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 22.

    Parsons, S. G. et al. Two white dwarfs in ultrashort binaries with detached, eclipsing, likely sub-stellar companions detected by K2. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 471, 976–986 (2017).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 23.

    Paczynski, B. Common-envelope binaries. In International Astronomical Union Symp. No. 73: Structure and Evolution of Close Binary Systems (eds Eggleton, P., Mitton, S. & Whelan, J.) 75–80 (Reidel, 1976).

  • 24.

    Xu, X.-J. & Li, X.-D. On the binding energy parameter λ of common-envelope evolution. Astrophys. J. 716, 114–121 (2010).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 25.

    Veras, D. & Gänsicke, B. T. Detectable close-in planets around white dwarfs through late unpacking. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 447, 1049–1058 (2015).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 26.

    Goldreich, P. & Soter, S. Q in the Solar System. Icarus 5, 375–389 (1966).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 27.

    Veras, D. & Fuller, J. Tidal circularization of gaseous planets orbiting white dwarfs. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 489, 2941–2953 (2019).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 28.

    Kreidberg, L. et al. Clouds in the atmosphere of the super-Earth exoplanet GJ1214b. Nature 505, 69–72 (2014).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 29.

    Agol, E. Transit surveys for Earths in the habitable zones of white dwarfs. Astrophys. J. Lett. 731, 31 (2011).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 30.

    Boss, A. P. et al. Working group on extrasolar planets. Proc. International Astronomical Union A 26A, 183–186 (2005).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 31.

    Ricker, G. R. et al. Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS). J. Astron. Telesc. Instrum. Syst. 1, 014003 (2014).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 32.

    Dufour, P. et al. The Montreal White Dwarf Database: a tool for the community. In 20th European White Dwarf Workshop (EuroWD16) (eds Tremblay, P.-E., Gaensicke, B. & Marsh, T.) 3–8 (2017).

  • 33.

    Stassun. K. G. et al. The TESS Input Catalog and candidate target list. Astron. J. 156, 102 (2018); correction 156, 183 (2018).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 34.

    Gould, A. & Morgan, C. W. Transit target selection using reduced proper motions. Astrophys. J. 585, 1056–1061 (2003).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 35.

    Altmann, M., Roeser, S., Demleitner, M., Bastian, U. & Schilbach, E. Hot Stuff for One Year (HSOY). A 583 million star proper motion catalogue derived from Gaia DR1 and PPMXL. Astron. Astrophys. 600, L4 (2017).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 36.

    Gentile Fusillo, N. P. et al. A Gaia Data Release 2 catalogue of white dwarfs and a comparison with SDSS. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 482, 4570–4591 (2019).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 37.

    Jenkins, J. M. Overview of the TESS Science Pipeline. In AAS/Division for Extreme Solar Systems III (chairs Mayor, M. & Rasio, F.) 106.05 (2015).

  • 38.

    Jenkins, J. M. et al. The TESS science processing operations center. In Proc. SPIE 9913 Software and Cyberinfrastructure for Astronomy IV (eds Chiozzi, G. & Guzman, J. C.) 99133E (2016).

  • 39.

    Smith, J. C. et al. Kepler presearch data conditioning II—a Bayesian approach to systematic error correction. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacif. 124, 1000–1014 (2012).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 40.

    Stumpe, M. C. et al. Multiscale systematic error correction via wavelet-based bandsplitting in Kepler data. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacif. 126, 100 (2014).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 41.

    Jenkins, J. M. The impact of solar-like variability on the detectability of transiting terrestrial planets. Astrophys. J. 575, 493–505 (2002).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 42.

    Evans, D. F. Evidence for unresolved exoplanet-hosting binaries in Gaia DR2. Res. Notes AAS 2, 20 (2018).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 43.

    Rizzuto, A. C. et al. Zodiacal Exoplanets in Time (ZEIT). VIII. A two-planet system in Praesepe from K2 Campaign 16. Astron. J. 156, 195 (2018).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 44.

    Lindegren, L. Re-normalising the Astrometric Chi-Square in Gaia DR2 Gaia Technical Note No. GAIA-C3-TN-LU-LL-124-01 (Gaia DPAC, 2018).

  • 45.

    Abell, G. O. Globular clusters and planetary nebulae discovered on the National Geographic Society–Palomar Observatory Sky Survey. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacif. 67, 258–261 (1955).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 46.

    Rappaport, S. et al. Drifting asteroid fragments around WD 1145+017. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 458, 3904–3917 (2016).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 47.

    Narita, N. et al. MuSCAT2: four-color simultaneous camera for the 1.52-m Telescopio Carlos Sánchez. J. Astron. Telesc. Instrum. Syst. 5, 015001 (2019).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 48.

    Schmidt, G. D., Weymann, R. J. & Foltz, C. B. A. Moderate-resolution, high-throughput CCD channel for the MMT Spectrograph. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacif. 101, 713 (1989).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 49.

    Miller, J. S. & Stone, R. P. The Kast Double Spectograph Lick Observatory Technical Report 66 (University of California Observatories/Lick Observatory, 1994).

  • 50.

    Chonis, T. S., Hill, G. J., Lee, H., Tuttle, S. E. & Vattiat, B. L. LRS2: the new facility low resolution integral field spectrograph for the Hobby–Eberly telescope. In Proc. SPIE Astronomical Telescopes and Instrumentation Vol. 9147 (eds Ramsay, S. K., McLean, I. S. & Takami, H.) 91470A (SPIE, 2014).

  • 51.

    Zeimann, G. Panacea source code (accessed 24 June 2020); https://github.com/grzeimann/Panacea (2019).

  • 52.

    Elias, J. H. et al. Design of the Gemini near-infrared spectrograph. In Proc. Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy (eds McLean, I. S. & Iye, M.) 62694C (2006).

  • 53.

    Mason, R. E. et al. The nuclear near-infrared spectral properties of nearby galaxies. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 217, 13 (2015).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 54.

    Telting, J. H. et al. FIES: the high-resolution Fiber-fed Echelle Spectrograph at the Nordic Optical Telescope. Astron. Nachr. 335, 41 (2014).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 55.

    Stempels, E. & Telting, J. FIEStool: automated data reduction for FIber-fed Echelle Spectrograph (FIES) Astrophysics Source Code Library http://ascl.net/1708.009 (2017).

  • 56.

    Fűrész, G. Design and Application of High Resolution and Multiobject Spectrographs: Dynamical Studies of Open Clusters. PhD thesis, Univ. Szeged (2008).

  • 57.

    Buchhave, L. A. et al. An abundance of small exoplanets around stars with a wide range of metallicities. Nature 486, 375–377 (2012).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 58.

    Stefanik, R. P., Latham, D. W. & Torres, G. Radial-velocity standard stars. In IAU Colloquium 170: Precise Stellar Radial Velocities Vol. 185 (eds Hearnshaw, J. B. & Scarfe, C. D.) 354–366 (1999).

  • 59.

    Lépine, S. et al. A spectroscopic catalog of the brightest (J < 9) M dwarfs in the northern sky. Astron. J. 145, 102 (2013).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 60.

    Cubillos, P. et al. WASP-8b: characterization of a cool and eccentric exoplanet with Spitzer. Astrophys. J. 768, 42 (2013).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 61.

    Xu, S. & Jura, M. Spitzer observations of white dwarfs: the missing planetary debris around DZ stars. Astrophys. J. 745, 88 (2012).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 62.

    Xu, S. et al. Infrared variability of two dusty white dwarfs. Astrophys. J. 866, 108 (2018).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 63.

    Blouin, S., Dufour, P., Thibeault, C. & Allard, N. F. A new generation of cool white dwarf atmosphere models. IV. Revisiting the spectral evolution of cool white dwarfs. Astrophys. J. 878, 63 (2019).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 64.

    Blouin, S., Dufour, P. & Allard, N. F. A new generation of cool white dwarf atmosphere models. I. Theoretical framework and applications to DZ stars. Astrophys. J. 863, 184 (2018).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 65.

    Kowalski, P. M. Infrared absorption of dense helium and its importance in the atmospheres of cool white dwarfs. Astron. Astrophys. 566, L8 (2014).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 66.

    Stassun, K. G., Corsaro, E., Pepper, J. A. & Gaudi, B. S. Empirical accurate masses and radii of single stars with TESS and Gaia. Astron. J. 155, 22 (2018).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 67.

    Eggleton, P. Evolutionary Processes in Binary and Multiple Stars (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2006).

  • 68.

    Zapolsky, H. S. & Salpeter, E. E. The mass–radius relation for cold spheres of low mass. Astrophys. J. 158, 809 (1969).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 69.

    Mestel, L. On the theory of white dwarf stars. I. The energy sources of white dwarfs. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 112, 583 (1952).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 70.

    van Horn, H. M. Cooling of white dwarfs. In International Astronomical Union Symp. No. 42: White Dwarfs (ed. Luyten, W. J.) 97–115 (Reidel, 1971).

  • 71.

    Mann, A. W., Feiden, G. A., Gaidos, E., Boyajian, T. & von Braun, K. How to constrain your M dwarf: measuring effective temperature, bolometric luminosity, mass, and radius. Astrophys. J. 804, 64 (2015); erratum 819, 87 (2016).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 72.

    Mann, A. W. et al. How to constrain your M dwarf. II. The mass–luminosity–metallicity relation from 0.075 to 0.70 Solar masses. Astrophys. J. 871, 63 (2019).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 73.

    Stassun, K. G. et al. The revised TESS input catalog and candidate target list. Astron. J. 158, 138 (2019).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 74.

    Pearce, L. A. Linear Orbits for the Impatient (accessed 24 June 2020); https://github.com/logan-pearce/LOFTI (2019).

  • 75.

    Pearce, L. A. et al. Orbital parameter determination for wide stellar binary systems in the age of Gaia. Astrophys. J. 894, 115 (2020).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 76.

    Blunt, S. et al. Orbits for the Impatient: a Bayesian rejection-sampling method for quickly fitting the orbits of long-period exoplanets. Astron. J. 153, 229 (2017).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 77.

    Eastman, J., Siverd, R. & Gaudi, B. S. Achieving better than 1 minute accuracy in the heliocentric and barycentric Julian dates. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacif. 122, 935 (2010).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 78.

    Mandel, K. & Agol, E. Analytic light curves for planetary transit searches. Astrophys. J. Lett. 580, 171–175 (2002).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 79.

    Eastman, J., Gaudi, B. S. & Agol, E. EXOFAST: a fast exoplanetary fitting suite in IDL. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacif. 125, 83–112 (2013).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 80.

    Gianninas, A., Strickland, B. D., Kilic, M. & Bergeron, P. Limb-darkening coefficients for eclipsing white dwarfs. Astrophys. J. 766, 3 (2013).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 81.

    Claret, A. et al. Gravity and limb-darkening coefficients for compact stars: DA, DB, and DBA eclipsing white dwarfs. Astron. Astrophys. 634, A93 (2020).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 82.

    Claret, A. & Bloemen, S. Gravity and limb-darkening coefficients for the Kepler, CoRoT, Spitzer, uvby, UBVRIJHK, and Sloan photometric systems. Astron. Astrophys. 529, A75 (2011).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 83.

    Seager, S. & Mallén-Ornelas, G. A unique solution of planet and star parameters from an extrasolar planet transit light curve. Astrophys. J. 585, 1038–1055 (2003).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 84.

    Lucy, L. B. & Sweeney, M. A. Spectroscopic binaries with circular orbits. Astron. J. 76, 544–556 (1971).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 85.

    Goodman, J. & Weare, J. Ensemble samplers with affine invariance. Comm. App. Math. Comp. Sci. 5, 65–80 (2010).

    MathSciNet 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 86.

    Kopal, Z. Close Binary Systems (Chapman & Hall, 1959).

  • 87.

    Kipping, D. M. Efficient, uninformative sampling of limb darkening coefficients for two-parameter laws. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 435, 2152–2160 (2013).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 88.

    Saumon, D. & Marley, M. S. The evolution of L and T dwarfs in color–magnitude diagrams. Astrophys. J. 689, 1327–1344 (2008).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 89.

    Nelson, L. A., Rappaport, S. A. & Joss, P. C. On the nature of the companion to Van Biesbroeck 8. Nature 316, 42–44 (1985).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 90.

    Chabrier, G., Johansen, A., Janson, M. & Rafikov, R. Giant planet and brown dwarf formation. In Protostars and Planets VI (eds Beuther, H. et al.) 619–642 (Univ. Arizona Press, 2014).

  • 91.

    Bowler, B. P., Blunt, S. C. & Nielsen, E. L. Population-level eccentricity distributions of imaged exoplanets and brown dwarf companions: dynamical evidence for distinct formation channels. Astron. J. 159, 63 (2020).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 92.

    Phillips, M. W. et al. A new set of atmosphere and evolution models for cool T–Y brown dwarfs and giant exoplanets. Astron. Astrophys. 637, A38 (2020).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 93.

    Miles, B. E. et al. Observations of disequilibrium CO chemistry in the coldest brown dwarfs. Astron. J. 160, 63 (2020).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 94.

    Morley, C. V. et al. An L band spectrum of the coldest brown dwarf. Astrophys. J. 858, 97 (2018).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 95.

    Morley, C. V. et al. Water clouds in Y dwarfs and exoplanets. Astrophys. J. 787, 78 (2014).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 96.

    Shappee, B. J. et al. The man behind the curtain: X-rays drive the UV through NIR variability in the 2013 active galactic nucleus outburst in NGC 2617. Astrophys. J. 788, 48 (2014).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 97.

    Kochanek, C. S. et al. The All-Sky Automated Survey for Supernovae (ASAS-SN) Light Curve Server v1.0. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacif. 129, 104502 (2017).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 98.

    Butters, O. W. et al. The first WASP public data release. Astron. Astrophys. 520, L10 (2010).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 99.

    Gizis, J. E. M-subdwarfs: spectroscopic classification and the metallicity scale. Astron. J. 113, 806–822 (1997).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 100.

    Lépine, S., Rich, R. M. & Shara, M. M. Revised metallicity classes for low-mass stars: dwarfs (dM), subdwarfs (sdM), extreme subdwarfs (esdM), and ultrasubdwarfs (usdM). Astrophys. J. 669, 1235–1247 (2007).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 101.

    Mann, A. W., Brewer, J. M., Gaidos, E., Lépine, S. & Hilton, E. J. Prospecting in late-type dwarfs: a calibration of infrared and visible spectroscopic metallicities of late K and M dwarfs spanning 1.5 dex. Astron. J. 145, 52 (2013).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 102.

    Newton, E. R. et al. The Hα emission of nearby M dwarfs and its relation to stellar rotation. Astrophys. J. 834, 85 (2017).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 103.

    West, A. A. et al. The Sloan Digital Sky Survey data release 7 spectroscopic M dwarf catalog. I. Data. Astron. J. 141, 97 (2011).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 104.

    Coşkunoğlu, B. et al. Local stellar kinematics from RAVE data—I. Local standard of rest. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 412, 1237–1245 (2011).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 105.

    Bensby, T., Feltzing, S. & Oey, M. S. Exploring the Milky Way stellar disk. A detailed elemental abundance study of 714 F and G dwarf stars in the solar neighbourhood. Astron. Astrophys. 562, A71 (2014).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 106.

    Carrillo, A., Hawkins, K., Bowler, B. P., Cochran, W. & Vanderburg, A. Know thy star, know thy planet: chemo-kinematically characterizing TESS targets. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 491, 4365–4381 (2020).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 107.

    Kilic, M. et al. The ages of the thin disk, thick disk, and the halo from nearby white dwarfs. Astrophys. J. 837, 162 (2017).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 108.

    Haywood, M., Di Matteo, P., Lehnert, M. D., Katz, D. & Gómez, A. The age structure of stellar populations in the solar vicinity. Clues of a two-phase formation history of the Milky Way disk. Astron. Astrophys. 560, A109 (2013).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 109.

    Xiang, M. et al. The ages and masses of a million Galactic-disk main-sequence turnoff and subgiant stars from the LAMOST Galactic Spectroscopic Surveys. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 232, 2 (2017).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 110.

    Sharma, S. et al. The K2-HERMES Survey: age and metallicity of the thick disc. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 490, 5335–5352 (2019).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 111.

    Webbink, R. F. Double white dwarfs as progenitors of R Coronae Borealis stars and type I supernovae. Astrophys. J. 277, 355–360 (1984).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 112.

    Pfahl, E., Rappaport, S. & Podsiadlowski, P. The Galactic population of low- and intermediate-mass X-ray binaries. Astrophys. J. 597, 1036–1048 (2003).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 113.

    Zorotovic, M., Schreiber, M. R., Gänsicke, B. T. & Nebot Gómez-Morán, A. Post-common-envelope binaries from SDSS. IX: Constraining the common-envelope efficiency. Astron. Astrophys. 520, A86 (2010).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 114.

    De Marco, O. et al. On the α formalism for the common envelope interaction. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 411, 2277–2292 (2011).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 115.

    Camacho, J. et al. Monte Carlo simulations of post-common-envelope white dwarf + main sequence binaries: comparison with the SDSS DR7 observed sample. Astron. Astrophys. 566, A86 (2014).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 116.

    Taam, R. E., Bodenheimer, P. & Ostriker, J. P. Double core evolution. I. A 16 M
    ☉ star with a 1 M
    ☉ neutron-star companion. Astrophys. J. 222, 269–280 (1978).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 117.

    Taam, R. E. & Bodenheimer, P. The common envelope evolution of massive stars. In X-Ray Binaries and Recycled Pulsars: Proc. NATO Advanced Research Workshop on X-Ray Binaries and the Formation of Binary and Millisecond Radio Pulsars (eds van den Heuvel, E. P. & Rappaport, S. A.) 281–291 (Springer Dordrecht, 1992).

  • 118.

    Tauris, T. M. & Dewi, J. D. M. On the binding energy parameter of common envelope evolution. Dependency on the definition of the stellar core boundary during spiral-in. Astron. Astrophys. 369, 170–173 (2001).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 119.

    Rappaport, S. et al. Discovery of two new thermally bloated low-mass white dwarfs among the Kepler binaries. Astrophys. J. 803, 82 (2015).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 120.

    Choi, J. et al. Mesa Isochrones and Stellar Tracks (MIST). I. Solar-scaled models. Astrophys. J. 823, 102 (2016).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 121.

    Rappaport, S., Podsiadlowski, P., Joss, P. C., Di Stefano, R. & Han, Z. The relation between white dwarf mass and orbital period in wide binary radio pulsars. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 273, 731–741 (1995).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 122.

    Kalomeni, B. et al. Evolution of cataclysmic variables and related binaries containing a white dwarf. Astrophys. J. 833, 83 (2016).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 123.

    Passy, J.-C., Mac Low, M.-M. & De Marco, O. On the survival of brown dwarfs and planets engulfed by their giant host star. Astrophys. J. Lett. 759, 30 (2012).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 124.

    Bear, E. & Soker, N. Evaporation of Jupiter-like planets orbiting extreme horizontal branch stars. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 414, 1788–1792 (2011).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 125.

    Schreiber, M. R., Gänsicke, B. T., Toloza, O., Hernandez, M.-S. & Lagos, F. Cold giant planets evaporated by hot white dwarfs. Astrophys. J. 887, L4 (2019).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 126.

    Kozai, Y. Secular perturbations of asteroids with high inclination and eccentricity. Astron. J. 67, 591–598 (1962).

    MathSciNet 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 127.

    Lidov, M. L. The evolution of orbits of artificial satellites of planets under the action of gravitational perturbations of external bodies. Planet. Space Sci. 9, 719–759 (1962).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 128.

    Stephan, A. P., Naoz, S. & Zuckerman, B. Throwing icebergs at white dwarfs. Astrophys. J. Lett. 844, 16 (2017).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 129.

    Chambers, J. E. A hybrid symplectic integrator that permits close encounters between massive bodies. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 304, 793–799 (1999).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 130.

    Veras, D. & Fuller, J. The dynamical history of the evaporating or disrupted ice giant planet around white dwarf WD J0914+1914. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 492, 6059–6066 (2019).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 131.

    Lainey, V., Arlot, J.-E., Karatekin, Ö. & van Hoolst, T. Strong tidal dissipation in Io and Jupiter from astrometric observations. Nature 459, 957–959 (2009).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 132.

    Kozakis, T., Kaltenegger, L. & Hoard, D. W. UV surface environments and atmospheres of Earth-like planets orbiting white dwarfs. Astrophys. J. 862, 69 (2018).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 133.

    Bonsor, A. & Veras, D. A wide binary trigger for white dwarf pollution. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 454, 53–63 (2015).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 134.

    Chang, Y. C. A study of the orientation of the orbit-planes of 16 visual binaries having determinate inclinations. Astron. J. 40, 11–15 (1929).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 135.

    Agati, J. L. et al. Are the orbital poles of binary stars in the solar neighbourhood anisotropically distributed? Astron. Astrophys. 574, A6 (2015).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 136.

    Heintz, W. D. A statistical study of binary stars. J. Roy. Astron. Soc. Can. 63, 275 (1969).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 137.

    Adams, F. C. & Bloch, A. M. Evolution of planetary orbits with stellar mass loss and tidal dissipation. Astrophys. J. 777, L30 (2013).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 138.

    Rasio, F. A., Tout, C. A., Lubow, S. H. & Livio, M. Tidal decay of close planetary orbits. Astrophys. J. 470, 1187 (1996).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 139.

    Payne, M. J., Veras, D., Holman, M. J. & Gänsicke, B. T. Liberating exomoons in white dwarf planetary systems. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 457, 217–231 (2016).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 140.

    Bromley, B. C., Kenyon, S. J., Geller, M. J. & Brown, W. R. Binary disruption by massive black holes: hypervelocity stars, S stars, and tidal disruption events. Astrophys. J. 749, L42 (2012).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 141.

    Faber, J. A., Rasio, F. A. & Willems, B. Tidal interactions and disruptions of giant planets on highly eccentric orbits. Icarus 175, 248–262 (2005).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 142.

    Mainetti, D. et al. The fine line between total and partial tidal disruption events. Astron. Astrophys. 600, A124 (2017).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 143.

    Kreidberg, L. Exoplanet atmosphere measurements from transmission spectroscopy and other planet star combined light observations. In Handbook of Exoplanets (eds Deeg, H. J. & Belmonte, J. A.) 2083–2105 (2018).

  • 144.

    Stevenson, K. B. Quantifying and predicting the presence of clouds in exoplanet atmospheres. Astrophys. J. 817, L16 (2016).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 145.

    Loeb, A. & Gaudi, B. S. Periodic flux variability of stars due to the reflex Doppler effect induced by planetary companions. Astrophys. J. Lett. 588, 117–120 (2003).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 146.

    van Kerkwijk, M. H. et al. Observations of Doppler boosting in Kepler light curves. Astrophys. J. 715, 51–58 (2010).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 147.

    Rauer, H. et al. The PLATO 2.0 mission. Exp. Astron. 38, 249–330 (2014).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 148.

    Chambers, K. C. et al. The Pan-STARRS1 surveys. Preprint at: https://www.arxiv.org/abs/1612.05560 (2016).

  • 149.

    Skrutskie, M. F. et al. The Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS). Astron. J. 131, 1163–1183 (2006).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 150.

    Cutri, R. M. et al. VizieR Online Data Catalog: AllWISE Data Release (Cutri+ 2013). VizieR Online Data Catalog II/328 (accessed 5 October 2019); http://vizier.u-strasbg.fr/viz-bin/VizieR?-source=II/328

  • Related Posts

    How Machine Learning has impacted Consumer Behaviour and Analysis
    Consumer Research

    How Machine Learning has impacted Consumer Behaviour and Analysis

    January 4, 2024
    Market Research The Ultimate Weapon for Business Success
    Consumer Research

    Market Research: The Ultimate Weapon for Business Success

    June 22, 2023
    Unveiling the Hidden Power of Market Research A Game Changer
    Consumer Research

    Unveiling the Hidden Power of Market Research: A Game Changer

    June 2, 2023
    7 Secrets of Market Research Gurus That Will Blow Your Mind
    Consumer Research

    7 Secrets of Market Research Gurus That Will Blow Your Mind

    May 8, 2023
    The Shocking Truth About Market Research Revealed!
    Consumer Research

    The Shocking Truth About Market Research: Revealed!

    April 25, 2023
    market research, primary research, secondary research, market research trends, market research news,
    Consumer Research

    Quantitative vs. Qualitative Research. How to choose the Right Research Method for Your Business Needs

    March 14, 2023
    Next Post
    University of Glasgow Launches Brand New Groundbreaking Fantasy Research Center

    University of Glasgow Launches Brand New Groundbreaking Fantasy Research Center

    Categories

    • Consumer Research
    • Data Analysis
    • Data Collection
    • Industry Research
    • Latest News
    • Market Insights
    • Marketing Research
    • Survey Research
    • Uncategorized

    Recent Posts

    • Ipsos Revolutionizes the Global Market Research Landscape
    • How Machine Learning has impacted Consumer Behaviour and Analysis
    • Market Research: The Ultimate Weapon for Business Success
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use
    • Antispam
    • DMCA

    Copyright © 2024 Globalresearchsyndicate.com

    Welcome Back!

    Login to your account below

    Forgotten Password?

    Retrieve your password

    Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

    Log In
    This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Cookie settingsACCEPT
    Privacy & Cookies Policy

    Privacy Overview

    This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
    Necessary
    Always Enabled
    Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
    Non-necessary
    Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
    SAVE & ACCEPT
    No Result
    View All Result
    • Latest News
    • Consumer Research
    • Survey Research
    • Marketing Research
    • Industry Research
    • Data Collection
    • More
      • Data Analysis
      • Market Insights

    Copyright © 2024 Globalresearchsyndicate.com