GLOBAL RESEARCH SYNDICATE
No Result
View All Result
  • Login
  • Latest News
  • Consumer Research
  • Survey Research
  • Marketing Research
  • Industry Research
  • Data Collection
  • More
    • Data Analysis
    • Market Insights
  • Latest News
  • Consumer Research
  • Survey Research
  • Marketing Research
  • Industry Research
  • Data Collection
  • More
    • Data Analysis
    • Market Insights
No Result
View All Result
globalresearchsyndicate
No Result
View All Result
Home Data Analysis

Potential for large-scale CO 2 removal via enhanced rock weathering with croplands

globalresearchsyndicate by globalresearchsyndicate
July 19, 2020
in Data Analysis
0
Potential for large-scale CO 2 removal via enhanced rock weathering with croplands
0
SHARES
13
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

  • 1.

    Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Global Warming Of 1.5 °C. An IPCC Special Report on the Impacts of Global Warming of 1.5 °C Above Pre-Industrial Levels and Related Global Greenhouse Gas Emission Pathways (World Meteorological Organization, 2018).

  • 2.

    Kantola, I. B. et al. Potential of global croplands and bioenergy crops for climate change mitigation through deployment for enhanced weathering. Biol. Lett. 13, 20160714 (2017).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 3.

    Zhang, G., Kang, J., Wang, T. & Zhu, C. Review and outlook for agromineral research in agriculture and climate change mitigation. Soil Res. 56, 113–122 (2018).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 4.

    Beerling, D. J. et al. Farming with crops and rocks to address global climate, food and soil security. Nat. Plants 4, 138–147 (2018).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 5.

    Mercure, J.-F. et al. Macroeconomic impact of stranded fossil fuel assests. Nat. Clim. Chang. 8, 588–593 (2018).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 6.

    Le Quéré, C. et al. Global carbon budget 2018. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 10, 2141–2194 (2018).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 7.

    United Nations Environment Programme The Emissions Gap Report 2018 (United Nations Environment Programme, 2018).

  • 8.

    Hagedorn, G. et al. Concerns of young protesters are justified. Science 364, 139–140 (2019).

    ADS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 9.

    Hansen, J. et al. Young people’s burden: requirement of negative CO2 emissions. Earth Syst. Dyn 8, 577–616 (2017).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 10.

    Rockström, J. et al. A roadmap for rapid decarbonisation. Science 355, 1269–1271 (2017).

    ADS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 11.

    The Royal Society Greenhouse Gas Removal Technologies (The Royal Society, 2018).

  • 12.

    Pacala, S. et al. Negative Emissions Technologies And Reliable Sequestration (National Academy of Sciences, 2018).

  • 13.

    Seifritz, W. CO2 disposal by means of silicates. Nature 345, 486 (1990).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 14.

    Schuiling, R. D. & Krijgsman, P. Enhanced weathering: an effective and cheap tool to sequester CO2. Clim. Change 74, 349–354 (2006).

    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 15.

    Kohler, P., Hartmann, J. & Wolf-Gladrow, D. A. Geoengineering potential of artificially enhanced silicate weathering of olivine. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 20228–20233 (2010).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 16.

    Hartmann, J. et al. Enhanced chemical weathering as a geoengineering strategy to reduce atmospheric carbon dioxide, supply nutrients, and mitigate ocean acidification. Rev. Geophys. 51, 113–149 (2013).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 17.

    Taylor, L. L. et al. Enhanced weathering strategies for stabilizing climate and averting ocean acidification. Nat. Clim. Chang. 6, 402–406 (2016).

    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 18.

    Kelland, M. E. et al. Increased yield and CO2 sequestration potential with the C4 cereal crop Sorghum bicolor cultivated in basaltic rock dust amended agricultural soil. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 3658–3676 (2020).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 19.

    Renforth, P. & Henderson, G. Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration. Rev. Geophys. 55, 636–674 (2017).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 20.

    Smith, P. et al. Land-based options for greenhouse gas removal and their impacts on ecosystem services and the sustainable development goals. Annu. Rev. Environ. Res. 44, 255–286 (2019).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 21.

    Renforth, P. The potential of enhanced weathering in the UK. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 10, 229–243 (2012).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 22.

    Strefler, J. et al. Potential and costs of carbon dioxide removal by enhanced weathering of rocks. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 034010 (2018).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 23.

    Fuss, S. et al. Negative emissions—Part 2: Costs, potentials and side effects. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 063002 (2018).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 24.

    Baik, E. et al. Geospatial analysis of near-term potential for carbon-negative bioenergy in the United States. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 3290–3295 (2018).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 25.

    Heck, V., Gerten, D., Lucht, W. & Popp, A. Biomass-based negative emissions difficult to reconcile with planetary boundaries. Nat. Clim. Chang. 8, 151–155 (2018).

    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 26.

    Amann, T. & Hartmann, J. Ideas and perspectives: synergies from co-deployment of negative emissions technologies. Biogeosciences 16, 2949–2960 (2019).

    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 27.

    Mayer, A. et al. The potential of agricultural land management to contribute to lower global surface temperature. Sci. Adv. 4, eaaq0932 (2018).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 28.

    Groffman, P. M. et al. Calcium additions and microbial nitrogen cycle processes in a northern hardwood forest. Ecosystems 9, 1289–1305 (2006).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 29.

    Dietzen, C., Harrison, R. & Michelsen-Correa, S. Effectiveness of enhanced mineral weathering as a carbon sequestration tool and alternative to agricultural lime: an incubation experiment. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 74, 251–258 (2018).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 30.

    Smith, P., Haszeldine, R. S. & Smith, S. M. Preliminary assessment of the potential for, and limitations to, terrestrial negative emissions technologies in the UK. Environ. Sci. Process. Impacts 18, 1400–1405 (2016).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 31.

    DeLucia, E., Kantola, I., Blanc-Betes, E., Bernacchi, C. & Beerling, D. J. Basalt application for carbon sequestration reduces nitrous oxide fluxes from cropland. Geophys. Res. Abstr. 21, EGU2019–EGU4500 (2019).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 32.

    Das, S. et al. Cropping with slag to address soil, environment, and food security. Front. Microbiol. 10, 1320 (2019).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 33.

    Rogelj, J. et al. Paris Agreement climate proposals need a boost to keep warming well below 2 °C. Nature 534, 631–639 (2016).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 34.

    Clark, P. U. et al. Consequences of twenty-first-century policy for multi-millennial climate and sea-level change. Nat. Clim. Chang. 6, 360–369 (2016).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 35.

    Crowder, D. W. & Reganold, J. P. Financial competitiveness of organic agriculture on a global scale. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 7611–7616 (2015).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 36.

    Bebbington, A. J. & Bury, J. T. Institutional challenges for mining and sustainability in Peru. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 17296–17301 (2009).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 37.

    Renforth, P. et al. Silicate production and availability for mineral carbonation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 45, 2035–2041 (2011).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 38.

    Renforth, P. The negative emission potential of alkaline materials. Nat. Commun. 10, 1401 (2019).

    ADS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 39.

    Tubana, B. S., Babu, T. & Datnoff, L. E. A review of silicon in soils and plants and its role in US agriculture: history and future perspectives. Soil Sci. 181, 393–411 (2016).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 40.

    Washbourne, C.-L. et al. Rapid removal of atmospheric CO2 in urban soils. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49, 5434–5440 (2015).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 41.

    Lekakh, S. N. et al. Kinetics of aqueous leaching and carbonization of steelmaking slag. Metallurg. Mater. Trans. B 39, 125–134 (2008).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 42.

    Haynes, R. J., Belyaeva, O. N. & Kingston, G. Evaluation of industrial waste sources of fertilizer silicon using chemical extractions and plant uptake. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 176, 238–248 (2013).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 43.

    Rodd, A. V. et al. Surface application of cement kiln dust and lime to forage land: effect on forage yield, tissue concentration and accumulation of nutrients. Can. J. Soil Sci. 90, 201–213 (2010).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 44.

    Ramos, C.G. et al. Evaluation of soil re-mineralizer from by-product of volcanic rock mining: experimental proof using black oats and maize crops. Nat. Res. Res. 10.1007/s11053–019–09529-x (2019).

  • 45.

    Savant, N. K., Datnoff, L. E. & Snyder, G. H. Depletion of plant-available silicon in soils: a possible cause of declining rice yields. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 28, 1245–1252 (1997).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 46.

    Ning, D. et al. Impacts of steel-slag-based fertilizer on soil acidity and silicon availability and metals-immobilization in a paddy soil. PLoS One 11, e0168163 (2016).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 47.

    Chen, J. Rapid urbanization in China: a real challenge to soil protection and food security. Catena 69, 1–15 (2007).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 48.

    United Nations Global Land Outlook 1st edn (United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification, 2017).

  • 49.

    Smith, M. R. & Myers, S. S. Impact of anthropogenic CO2 emissions on global human nutrition. Nat. Clim. Chang. 8, 834–839 (2018).

    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 50.

    Cui, Z. et al. Pursuing sustainable productivity with millions of smallholder farmers. Nature 555, 363–366 (2018).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 51.

    Pidgeon, N. F. & Spence, E. Perceptions of enhanced weathering as a biological negative emissions option. Biol. Lett. 13, 20170024 (2017).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 52.

    Daval, D., Calvarusa, C., Guyut, F. & Turpault, M.-P. Time-dependent feldspar dissolution rates resulting from surface passivation: experimental evidence and geochemical implications. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 498, 226–236 (2018).

    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 53.

    Ricke, K., Drout, L., Caldeira, K. & Tavoni, M. Country-level social cost of carbon. Nat. Clim. Chang. 8, 895–900 (2018).

    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 54.

    Cox, E., Pidgeon, N. F., Spence, E. M. & Thomas, G. Blurred lines: the ethics and policy of greenhouse gas removal at scale. Front. Environ. Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2018.00038 (2018).

  • 55.

    Berner, R. A. Rate control of mineral dissolution under Earth surface conditions. Am. J. Sci. 278, 1235–1252 (1978).

    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 56.

    Maher, K. The dependence of chemical weathering rates on fluid residence time. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 294, 101–110 (2010).

    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 57.

    Abatzoglou, J. T., Dobrowski, S. Z., Parks, S. A. & Hegewisch, K. C. TerraClimate, a high-resolution global dataset of monthly climate and climatic water balance from 1958-2015. Sci. Data 5, 170191 (2018).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 58.

    Huang, Z. W. et al. Reconstruction of global gridded monthly sectoral water withdrawals for 1971-2010 and analysis of their spatiotemporal patterns. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 22, 2117–2133 (2018).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 59.

    Siebert, S. & Doll, P. Quantifying blue and green virtual water contents in global crop production as well as potential production losses without irrigation. J. Hydrol. 384, 198–217 (2010).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 60.

    Aagaard, P. & Helgeson, H. C. Thermodynamic and kinetic constraints on reaction-rates among minerals and aqueous-solutions. 1. Theoretical considerations. Am. J. Sci. 282, 237–285 (1982).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 61.

    Lasaga, A. C. Chemical-kinetics of water-rock interactions. J. Geophys. Res. 89, 4009–4025 (1984).

    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 62.

    Brantley, S. L., Kubicki, J. D. & White, A. F. Kinetics of Water–Rock Interaction (Springer, 2008).

  • 63.

    Harley, A. D. & Gilkes, R. J. Factors influencing the release of plant nutrient elements from silicate rock powders: a geochemical overview. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst. 56, 11–36 (2000).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 64.

    Taylor, L. L. et al. Biological evolution and the long-term carbon cycle: integrating mycorrhizal evolution and function into the current paradigm. Geobiology 7, 171–191 (2009).

    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 65.

    Nelson, P. N. & Su, N. Soil pH buffering capacity: a descriptive function and its application to some acidic tropical soils. Aust. J. Soil Sci. 48, 201–207 (2010).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 66.

    Cerling, T. Carbon dioxide in the atmosphere: evidence from Cenozoic and Mesozoic paleosols. Am. J. Sci. 291, 377–400 (1991).

    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 67.

    Taylor, L., Banwart, S. A., Leake, J. R. & Beerling, D. J. Modelling the evolutionary rise of ectomycorrhizal on sub-surface weathering environments and the geochemical carbon cycle. Am. J. Sci. 311, 369–403 (2011).

    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 68.

    Banwart, S. A., Berg, A. & Beerling, D. J. Process-based modeling of silicate mineral weathering responses to increasing atmospheric CO2 and climate change. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 23, GB4013 (2009).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 69.

    Petavratzi, E., Kingman, S. & Lowndes, I. Particulates from mining operations: a review of sources, effects and regulations. Miner. Eng. 18, 1183–1199 (2005).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 70.

    Cepuritis, R., Garboczi, E. J., Ferraris, C. F., Jacobsen, S. & Sorensen, B. E. Measurement of particle size distribution and specific surface area for crushed concrete aggregate fines. Adv. Powder Technol. 28, 706–720 (2017).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 71.

    Navarre-Sitchler, A. & Brantley, S. Basalt weathering across scales. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 261, 321–334 (2007).

    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 72.

    Brantley, S. L. & Mellott, N. P. Surface area and porosity of primary silicate minerals. Am. Mineral. 85, 1767–1783 (2000).

    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 73.

    Moosdorf, N., Renforth, P. & Hartmann, J. Carbon dioxide efficiency of terrestrial weathering. Environ. Sci. Technol. 48, 4809–4816 (2014).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 74.

    Salisbury, J. E. et al. Seasonal observations of surface waters in two Gulf of Maine estuary-plume systems: relationships between watershed attributes, optical measurements and surface p
    CO2. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 77, 245–252 (2008).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 75.

    Darling, P. & Society for Mining, Metallurgy and Exploration (U.S.). SME Mining Engineering Handbook 3rd edn (Society for Mining, Metallurgy and Exploration, 2011).

  • 76.

    InfoMine, Mining Cost Service http://www.infomine.com/ (Infomine, 2009).

  • 77.

    Tromans, D. Mineral comminution: energy efficiency considerations. Min. Eng. 21, 613–620 (2008).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 78.

    Hartmann, J. & Moosdorf, N. The new global lithological map database GLiM: a representation of rock properties at the Earth surface. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 13, Q12004 (2012).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 79.

    Protected Planet: The World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA)/The Global Database on Protected Areas Management Effectiveness (GD-PAME) https://www.protectedplanet.net/ (UNEP-WCMC and IUCN, 2018).

  • 80.

    ROTARU, A. S. et al. Modelling a logistic problem by creating an origin-destination cost matrix using GIS technology. Bull. UASVM Horticulture 71, https://doi.org/10.15835/buasvmcn-hort:9697 (2014).

  • 81.

    Osorio, C. Dynamic origin-destination matrix calibration for large-scale network simulators. Transport. Res. C 98, 186–206 (2019).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 82.

    International Energy Agency The Future of Rail, Opportunities for Energy and the Environment (International Energy Agency, 2019).

  • 83.

    Liimatainen, H., van Vliet, O. & Aplyn, D. The potential of electric trucks—an international commodity-level analysis. Appl. Energy 236, 804–814 (2019).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 84.

    GDP (current US$) https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.CD (The World Bank, 2016).

  • 85.

    Bauer, N. et al. Shared socio-economic pathways of the energy sector – quantifying the narratives. Glob. Environ. Change 42, 316–330 (2017).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 86.

    Xi, F. et al. Substantial global carbon uptake by cement carbonation. Nat. Geosci. 9, 880–883 (2016).

    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 87.

    U.S. Geological Survey. Mineral Commodity Summaries 2006 (US Geological Survey, 2006).

  • Related Posts

    How Machine Learning has impacted Consumer Behaviour and Analysis
    Consumer Research

    How Machine Learning has impacted Consumer Behaviour and Analysis

    January 4, 2024
    Market Research The Ultimate Weapon for Business Success
    Consumer Research

    Market Research: The Ultimate Weapon for Business Success

    June 22, 2023
    Unveiling the Hidden Power of Market Research A Game Changer
    Consumer Research

    Unveiling the Hidden Power of Market Research: A Game Changer

    June 2, 2023
    7 Secrets of Market Research Gurus That Will Blow Your Mind
    Consumer Research

    7 Secrets of Market Research Gurus That Will Blow Your Mind

    May 8, 2023
    The Shocking Truth About Market Research Revealed!
    Consumer Research

    The Shocking Truth About Market Research: Revealed!

    April 25, 2023
    market research, primary research, secondary research, market research trends, market research news,
    Consumer Research

    Quantitative vs. Qualitative Research. How to choose the Right Research Method for Your Business Needs

    March 14, 2023
    Next Post
    Advancements and Efficient Clinical Outcomes would Drive the Industry Growth with Top Key Player’s Analysis 2018 – 2028 – 3w Market News Reports

    Soft Drink Concentrates Market Intelligence Research Reports for Actionable Insights 2018 to 2028 – 3w Market News Reports

    Categories

    • Consumer Research
    • Data Analysis
    • Data Collection
    • Industry Research
    • Latest News
    • Market Insights
    • Marketing Research
    • Survey Research
    • Uncategorized

    Recent Posts

    • Ipsos Revolutionizes the Global Market Research Landscape
    • How Machine Learning has impacted Consumer Behaviour and Analysis
    • Market Research: The Ultimate Weapon for Business Success
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use
    • Antispam
    • DMCA

    Copyright © 2024 Globalresearchsyndicate.com

    Welcome Back!

    Login to your account below

    Forgotten Password?

    Retrieve your password

    Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

    Log In
    This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Cookie settingsACCEPT
    Privacy & Cookies Policy

    Privacy Overview

    This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
    Necessary
    Always Enabled
    Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
    Non-necessary
    Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
    SAVE & ACCEPT
    No Result
    View All Result
    • Latest News
    • Consumer Research
    • Survey Research
    • Marketing Research
    • Industry Research
    • Data Collection
    • More
      • Data Analysis
      • Market Insights

    Copyright © 2024 Globalresearchsyndicate.com