GLOBAL RESEARCH SYNDICATE
No Result
View All Result
  • Login
  • Latest News
  • Consumer Research
  • Survey Research
  • Marketing Research
  • Industry Research
  • Data Collection
  • More
    • Data Analysis
    • Market Insights
  • Latest News
  • Consumer Research
  • Survey Research
  • Marketing Research
  • Industry Research
  • Data Collection
  • More
    • Data Analysis
    • Market Insights
No Result
View All Result
globalresearchsyndicate
No Result
View All Result
Home Data Collection

February 2020 Housing Market Trends Report

globalresearchsyndicate by globalresearchsyndicate
March 5, 2020
in Data Collection
0
February 2020 Housing Market Trends Report
0
SHARES
1
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

  • For-sale homes declined by 15.3 percent in February year-over-year, and inventory in large markets decreased by 16.3 percent
  • The February national median listing price was $310,000, up 3.9 percent year-over-year and prices are re-accelerating
  • Nationally, homes sold in 80 days in February, three days more quickly than last year

Realtor.com®’s February data release reveals that the U.S. housing market continued to tighten as the inventory of for-sale homes continued to evaporate and home prices rose. However, it remains to be seen if new concerns about the spread of the Coronavirus domestically will dampen what is shaping up to be a competitive home-buying season.

The total number of homes available for sale continues to decline at an accelerating pace. Nationally, inventory decreased 15.3 percent in year-over-year in February, a faster rate of decline compared to the 13.6 percent year-over-year drop in January and the largest year-over-year decline since realtor.com began tracking inventory data. This amounted to a loss of 184,000 listings compared to February of last year, and inventory is now at its lowest since realtor.com began tracking in 2012. The volume of newly listed properties in February has also declined by 2.7 percent since last year, although an improvement to the 10.7 percent decline seen in January. 

Housing inventory in the 50 largest U.S. metros declined by 16.3 percent year-over-year in February, a boon for sellers who will draw more attention to their properties, but adds to homebuyer struggles. The metros which saw the biggest declines in inventory were Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ (-42.7 percent); San Diego-Carlsbad, CA (-36.6%); and San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA (-36.2 percent). Only two of the 50 metros saw inventory increase over the year: Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI (+12.2 percent); and San Antonio-New Braunfels, TX (+2.6 percent). 

As inventory has reached its lowest point on record, the typical property is selling more quickly than last year. Nationally, homes sold in 80 days in February, three days more quickly than February of last year. In the 50 largest U.S. metros, the typical home sold five days more quickly than last year. Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, CT; Raleigh, NC;  and Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV; saw the largest decreases in days on market with properties spending 22, 18, and 16 fewer days on the market than last year, respectively. Meanwhile, properties in Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA; Denver-Aurora-Lakewood, CO; San Diego-Carlsbad, CA  sold 10, 6, and 4 days more slowly, respectively. 

The median U.S. listing price grew by 398 percent, to $310,000  in February, which is a slight acceleration compared to last month, when the median listing price grew by 3.4 percent over the year. In February, listing prices in the largest metros grew by 6.5 percent, on average.

Of the largest 50 metros, 45 saw year-over-year gains in median listing prices. ; and  Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD (+17.3 percent); Rochester, NY (+15.0 percent); and Pittsburgh, PA (+14.3 percent) posted the highest year-over-year median list price growth in February. The steepest price declines were seen in Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI (-3.4 percent); Louisville/Jefferson County, KY-IN (-1.9 percent); and Houston-The Woodlands-Sugarland, TX (-1.5 percent). However, Houston and Louisville saw yearly declines decelerate compared to last month.

In February, 15.5 percent of active listings saw their listing prices reduced. The share of listings with reduced prices remained the same compared to last year. Among the nation’s largest markets, 22 still saw an increase in their share of price reductions compared to last year. Sacramento–Roseville–Arden-Arcade, CA saw the greatest increase in price reductions in February, up 13.9 percent. It was followed by Indianapolis-Carmel-Anderson, IN (+7.9 percent) and Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA (+7.4 percent). 

Greatest Declines in Inventory – Metro Level 

Metro Active Listing Count YoY Median Listing Price Median Listing Price YoY Median Days on Market Median Days on Market Y-Y
Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, Ariz. -42.7% $400,000 14.3% 48 -4
San Diego-Carlsbad, Calif. -36.6% $749,100 12.0% 37 4
San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, Calif. -36.2% $1,199,900 11.6% 22 -4
Denver-Aurora-Lakewood, Colo. -35.9% $559,600 12.0% 38 6
Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, Wash. -33.7% $600,100 1.3% 38 -8
Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, Pa.-N.J.-Del.-Md. -29.4% $295,000 17.3% 69 -10
Cincinnati, Ohio-Ky.-Ind. -28.6% $284,500 12.7% 66 -5
Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia, N.C.-S.C. -28.2% $348,600 5.6% 64 -6
Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, Ore.-Wash. -28.1% $485,000 1.1% 58 10
Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, Calif. -26.8% $419,100 4.9% 60 3
Providence-Warwick, R.I.-Mass. -25.2% $389,100 8.8% 66 -10
Sacramento–Roseville–Arden-Arcade, Calif. -25.0% $500,100 8.7% 40 -10
Nashville-Davidson–Murfreesboro–Franklin, Tenn. -25.0% $371,000 3.8% 36 -9
Rochester, N.Y. -24.8% $230,000 15.0% 45 -15
Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-Va.-Md.-W. Va. -23.6% $495,100 10.7% 39 -16
Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, Fla. -22.9% $280,000 4.2% 61 -5
San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, Calif. -22.3% $949,100 8.2% 18 -9
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, Calif.* -21.8% $959,900 N/A 66 N/A
Austin-Round Rock, Texas -21.7% $360,100 2.9% 61 -3
Boston-Cambridge-Newton, Mass.-N.H. -21.4% $600,100 9.2% 55 -7
Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, Va.-N.C. -20.5% $310,500 8.9% 57 -11
Baltimore-Columbia-Towson, Md. -20.5% $320,100 6.7% 66 -6
Memphis, Tenn.-Miss.-Ark. -20.5% $237,100 13.2% 79 3
Kansas City, Mo.-Kan. -20.4% $330,100 6.0% 94 3
Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, Fla. -20.0% $325,100 8.4% 68 -1
Oklahoma City, Okla. -18.9% $257,700 9.1% 53 -15
Cleveland-Elyria, Ohio -18.8% $189,600 1.6% 81 -2
Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, Conn. -18.5% $275,000 3.8% 74 -22
Columbus, Ohio -18.4% $299,800 14.2% 58 -10
Birmingham-Hoover, Ala. -17.6% $256,400 9.2% 71 -13
Las Vegas-Henderson-Paradise, Nev. -17.5% $328,000 5.8% 46 -4
Indianapolis-Carmel-Anderson, Ind. -17.5% $275,000 8.0% 80 -2
St. Louis, Mo.-Ill. -15.7% $220,000 2.3% 89 1
Buffalo-Cheektowaga-Niagara Falls, N.Y. -15.6% $200,000 9.6% 67 0
Milwaukee-Waukesha-West Allis, Wis. -15.1% $320,000 6.7% 57 -11
Pittsburgh, Pa. -15.1% $200,100 14.3% 96 -12
New Orleans-Metairie, La. -14.2% $284,600 2.9% 80 -3
Jacksonville, Fla. -13.9% $320,000 3.9% 74 -6
Richmond, Va. -13.8% $327,000 3.2% 59 -5
Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, Fla. -13.5% $410,000 3.7% 88 -4
Raleigh, N.C. -12.5% $367,800 4.4% 64 -18
Louisville/Jefferson County, Ky.-Ind. -12.3% $255,000 -1.9% 64 -2
Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, Ga. -10.5% $325,000 2.4% 56 0
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, Texas -9.6% $340,100 -1.3% 56 -3
Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, Mich -8.7% $229,100 4.1% 59 -4
New York-Newark-Jersey City, N.Y.-N.J.-Pa. -8.1% $559,100 5.9% 80 -2
Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land, Texas -5.3% $306,000 -1.5% 60 -6
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, Ill.-Ind.-Wis. -4.0% $320,000 2.4% 45 -11
San Antonio-New Braunfels, Texas 2.6% $290,000 0.0% 71 1
Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, Minn.-Wis. 12.2% $375,100 -3.4% 49 -11

*Some data points for Los Angeles have been excluded due to data unavailability. 


Subscribe to our mailing list to receive monthly updates and notifications on the latest data and research.

Related Posts

How Machine Learning has impacted Consumer Behaviour and Analysis
Consumer Research

How Machine Learning has impacted Consumer Behaviour and Analysis

January 4, 2024
Market Research The Ultimate Weapon for Business Success
Consumer Research

Market Research: The Ultimate Weapon for Business Success

June 22, 2023
Unveiling the Hidden Power of Market Research A Game Changer
Consumer Research

Unveiling the Hidden Power of Market Research: A Game Changer

June 2, 2023
7 Secrets of Market Research Gurus That Will Blow Your Mind
Consumer Research

7 Secrets of Market Research Gurus That Will Blow Your Mind

May 8, 2023
The Shocking Truth About Market Research Revealed!
Consumer Research

The Shocking Truth About Market Research: Revealed!

April 25, 2023
market research, primary research, secondary research, market research trends, market research news,
Consumer Research

Quantitative vs. Qualitative Research. How to choose the Right Research Method for Your Business Needs

March 14, 2023
Next Post
Body Shaping Implants Market 2020 Primary Research, Secondary Research, Growth Analysis, Size and Forecast by 2026 – Dagoretti News

X-ray Fluorescene Coating Thickness Gauge Market Primary Research, Secondary Research, Size, Trends and Forecast by 2026

Categories

  • Consumer Research
  • Data Analysis
  • Data Collection
  • Industry Research
  • Latest News
  • Market Insights
  • Marketing Research
  • Survey Research
  • Uncategorized

Recent Posts

  • Ipsos Revolutionizes the Global Market Research Landscape
  • How Machine Learning has impacted Consumer Behaviour and Analysis
  • Market Research: The Ultimate Weapon for Business Success
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Antispam
  • DMCA

Copyright © 2024 Globalresearchsyndicate.com

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Cookie settingsACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT
No Result
View All Result
  • Latest News
  • Consumer Research
  • Survey Research
  • Marketing Research
  • Industry Research
  • Data Collection
  • More
    • Data Analysis
    • Market Insights

Copyright © 2024 Globalresearchsyndicate.com